J.D.K v J.K (584-2022) [2024] ZAECQBHC 58 (10 October 2024)

In the Eastern Cape High Court, the applicant sought to vary a Rule 43 order regarding maintenance for his major dependent child, A, after she ceased tertiary studies and began working. Despite his claims of financial distress, the court found no evidence supporting complete removal of maintenance, particularly given A’s ongoing living expenses and the applicant’s abusive conduct contributing to her emotional struggles. The court reduced the maintenance amount, backdated to July 1, 2024, and deleted an inapplicable provision of the Rule 43 order.

J.D.K v J.K (584-2022) [2024] ZAECQBHC 58 (10 October 2024)

2025-01-31T09:08:28+00:002025/01/31|Uncategorized|
Go to Top